Overview
Customer Experience Design (CXD) designers didn't have a central place to access all the things they needed to be successful. Our leadership team decided we needed to create a hub for resources (specifically for resource-sharing and onboarding). 
I was brought on to create content to help guide colleagues, hiring managers, and new hires quickly find the resources they need.
My Role
Content strategist
• User researcher
• UX writer
I also collaborated with two visual designers who produced all visual aspects, including layouts, wireframes, typographic elements, and photography.
Tools I used
• Excel: for content audits and IA work
• Word: for drafting content and gathering edits
• Sketch: for adding draft content in lo-fi wireframes
• Mural: for documenting and synthesizing research findings
• Otter: for recording user interviews
• Teams: for cross-team communication
Platform: SharePoint
Herding (resource) cats
Our team's resources were scattered, incomplete, and outdated.
I took a content audit of the most recent assets to understand what we had, what we were missing, and what needed to be updated.
From there, I: 
Conducted designer interviews to understand their sentiments, what resources they reached for the most, and what resources they wished they had access to
Conducted interviews with colleagues and partners outside CXD, to learn what they look for when using our site
Synthesized these findings via affinity mapping
Created a preliminary IA
Created rough sketches to begin mapping out what could go on each page
​​​​​​​Created an updated catalog of all the site assets 
Roadblocks
Fannie Mae is a Microsoft shop, so the company standard for intranets is SharePoint. 
The tool is great for content creators who want a drag and drop experience but doesn't offer the same flexibility that other content management systems do. We ran into design issues with imagery and content block sizing, pre-set SharePoint components, and discoverability with SharePoint SEO. 
Ultimately, we saw SharePoint's limitations as a blessing in disguise. I looked at these guard rails similar to specifications a stakeholder would need and designed around them.
The outcome
We now have a live, design team SharePoint site!

I crafted all content for: 
The homepage 
All onboarding page content
All microcopy, including CTAs, headers, and beyond
Hiring manager, new hire, and start partner experiences
Communities of practice pages
Our design process
Our team
The real winners in this equation are newly-hired designers and hiring managers. With my simplified, centralized content, designers and managers can now quickly get access to onboarding materials, without having to go on full-blown scavenger hunt.
If I could change a few things...
If I could do this project all over again, I would:
Create a separate experience for design teammates and the general Fannie Mae population (these groups have different goals when they visit our site)
Make interactive onboarding assets: for example, interactive checklists for hiring managers versus a static one
Do more iterative testing and changes (from a content governance perspective, we didn't account for team members switching teams/ leaving)  
​​​​​​​Push to use a CMS with more design flexibility (Drupal or Wordpress were early front-runners)
Back to Top